Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JOHN PINNOW Greenwood, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana STEPHEN TESMER Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana FI...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION FILED Dec 31 2008, 9:37 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana CYNTHIA L. PLOUGHE Deputy Att...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION FILED Dec 31 2008, 9:21 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: CHARLES W. LAHEY South Bend, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CAR...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
FOR PUBLICATION FILED Dec 31 2008, 9:06 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK APPELLANT PRO SE: BRENDA SAALFRANK Fort Wayne, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: HEIDI K. KOENEMA...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana CYNTHIA L. PLOUGHE Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: JENNIFER A. JOAS Joas & Stott...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ELIZABETH A. GABIG Marion County Public Defender Agency Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana ARTURO RODRIGUEZ ...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION FILED Dec 31 2008, 8:57 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DAVID BECSEY Zeigler Cohen & Koch Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR ...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana CYNTHIA L. PLOUGHE Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana FILED Dec 30 2008, 8:32 am of the supreme court, cou...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: DARRON S. STEWART DAVID W. STEWART Stewart & Stewart Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: LINDA Y. HAMMEL Yarling & Robinson Indianapolis, Indiana ...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: T. MICHAEL CARTER Scottsburg, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana MONIKA PREKOPA TALBOT Deputy Attorney General Indianapoli...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: TIMOTHY E. VOJSLAVEK Vojslavek & Catsadimas, P.C. Valparaiso, Indiana FILED Dec 30 2008, 8:45 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK ...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: SUSAN K. CARPENTER Public Defender of Indiana JONATHAN O. CHENOWETH Deputy Public Defender Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney ...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION FILED ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: RONALD C. SMITH JEFFREY B. HALBERT Stewart & Irwin, P.C. Indianapolis, Indiana Dec 29 2008, 8:45 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ALAN J. IRVIN PETER H. DONAHOE Gilday Donahoe & Irvin, P.C. Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: ROBERT K. STANLEY KATHY L. OSBORN Baker & Daniels ...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JEREMY K. NIX Matheny, Michael, Hahn & Denman, L.L.P. Huntington, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana ELLEN H. MEILAENDER...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION FILED Dec 29 2008, 9:07 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: KENNETH J. FALK GAVIN M. ROSE ACLU of Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana ...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: DAVID W. STONE IV Anderson, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana ARTHUR THADDEUS PERRY Deputy Attorney General Indianapoli...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: JONATHAN L. MAYES NICOLE R. KELSEY Office of Corporation Counsel Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE (Intervenor) HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK: MELISSA J...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FILED FOR PUBLICATION Dec 23 2008, 9:00 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: MICHELLE F. KRAUS Fort Wayne, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CAR...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: THOMAS J. COSTAKIS AMY J. ADOLAY Krieg DeVault LLP Indianapolis, Indiana JONATHAN BECKER American United Life Ins. Co. Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR A...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JILL S. SWOPE Sterba & Swope, LLP Schererville, Indiana FILED Dec 23 2008, 8:51 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK IN THE COURT OF...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: KAREN CELESTINO-HORSEMAN Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana MONIKA PREKOPA TALBOT Deputy Attorney General In...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana CYNTHIA L. PLOUGHE Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: QUINTON L. ELLIS Fort Wayne, I...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
FILED FOR PUBLICATION Dec 22 2008, 9:12 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: BARBARA J. SIMMONS Oldenburg, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CAR...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: KENT HULL Indiana Legal Services, Inc. South Bend, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: RANDY J. SPITAELS Kindig & Sloat, PC Nappanee, Indiana FILED of the supreme...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FILED FOR PUBLICATION Dec 18 2008, 9:22 am of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court CLERK ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: PEYTON L. BERG Bose McKinney & Evans LLP Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEY...
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collate...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: AARON J. BUTLER Haller & Colvin, P.C. Fort Wayne, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: BRYAN H. BABB MARISOL SANCHEZ Bose McKinney & Evans LLP Indianapolis, India...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: L. ALEXANDER WOLOSHANSKY Merrillville, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana ELIZABETH ROGERS Deputy Attorney General Indiana...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...
Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collater...